Should People Be Forced to Buy Liability Insurance for their Guns? (Reblog)


This is a rather lengthy review of the concept of applying insurance as a de facto regulatory tool for restricting gun ownership. Megan McArdle comes to the conclusion that it’s effectively useless, and so is a blatant admission that the move is an attempt at punishing lawful gun owners to the point that they voluntarily slow or stop gun purchases.

Summary: “The problem is, it’s not clear to me that any law which could actually be enacted would even a partial solution to gun crime. The people who will buy insurance will, by and large, be the people who have assets and social respect to lose by breaking the law . . . which is precisely why they’re quite unlikely to commit a gun crime. The people who are most likely to use the guns to a bad end will simply do without.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s